Subject: RE: Matching Attributes with @ From: John Robert Gardner <jrgardn@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 20:33:38 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Kay Michael wrote: > Confusion upon confusion! > Actually, you've come to exactly the opposite of the truth. An element is > the parent of its attributes, but the attributes are not children of the > element. > > And if that seems absurd, just substitute some non-biological words like > "controller" and "component" for "parent" and "child", and it doesn't seem > so bad. I must be getting punchy. Would I be pardoned for punning that, in effect, all attributes are bastards, then? Offered as a laugh and as thanks to everyone who's helped so much. :-() jr > > Mike K > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Matching Attributes with @, John Robert Gardner | Thread | Re: Matching Attributes with @, Francois Lachance |
RE: RE: Matching Attributes with @, John Robert Gardner | Date | Re: XSL template match question, Mike Brown |
Month |