Subject: Re: what if use of up-to-date xslt processor not an option? From: Dan Morrison <dman@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 23:08:49 +1200 |
Warren Hedley wrote: > alex chang wrote: > > > > I've been reading an XML Namespaces FAQ, and I thought I might be able > > to work around my problem by having in my xsl: > > > > <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl" > > xmlns:trans="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> > > I doubt that any processor will allow you to combine elements > from different editions of the spec. Supremely imaginative try tho! It's an out-there concept. " I can't do what I want in this language, I'll just shift into this one for a bit... " Imagine if you could! Because Alex, most xsl-list denizens hold that because of the 4% variation in specs (something like the difference between English English and 'Merican), old MSXML is a COMPLETELY different language. ... to stop floggong that horse, an up-to-date processor IS an option. How to upgrade whatever version of IE you're using to transform is documented a dozen times in this list. If you're being locked up without your rights down South in NTsville, get a nearby developer do do it for you. Otherwise, you should be aware that the old version is released as 'unsupported software' from MS, - and _DEFINATELY_ unsupported by this group. Everyone's still covering their ass by calling stuff 'beta's and pre-releases. Don't make it harder on yourself than it already is. : Dan Morrison : The Web Limited : XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: what if use of up-to-date xslt , Warren Hedley | Thread | Re: what if use of up-to-date xslt , Mike Brown |
Counting siblings..., Giles Smith | Date | XML + XSL on internet navigators, Stéphane Mamdy |
Month |