Subject: Machine-readable comments (Was: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted?) From: David_Marston@xxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 14:05:39 -0400 |
Mike Brown says: >Comments are not required to be reported by an XML parser, so you should >never depend on being able to process them with XSLT. Isn't that a little harsh? If I know what parser I'll be using, and I know that the stylesheets won't be going to a place where an unknown parser is used, why not have specially-structured comments? Recall that <xsl:template match="comment()" /> is valid in XSLT, so the Working Group must have thought that the above would work in many common parser/processor situations, and indeed it does. .................David Marston XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: passing a parameter to select a, Kay Michael | Thread | Re: Machine-readable comments (Was:, Mike Brown |
Re: How is this part of the XSLT sp, David Carlisle | Date | Re: How is this part of the XSLT sp, Bart Schuller |
Month |