RE: counter

Subject: RE: counter
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 09:58:05 +0100
> I don't see why Mike Kay took the approach he did. If I understood the
> problem, this xsl:for-each and following-sibling:: business 
> doesn't seem at all as efficient as: ...

I took the approach for the very common software engineering reason that I
was reusing the solution to a slightly more difficult problem.

Mike K


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread