Subject: RE: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted? From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <TRA@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 12:37:41 +0200 |
> > can't you put structured comments into an element in an extension > > namespace, so long as you provide an empty fallback? > > Yes you can, but it seems convoluted to me (and some XSLT 0.9 > processors > don't support this mechanism). It strikes me that if > processing instructions > are useful for anything, they should be useful for this. Interesting. What exactly do you have in mind? Embedding <?...?> within templates, or so? -- Thorbjørn XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: How is this part of the XSLT sp, Pawson, David | Thread | RE: How is this part of the XSLT sp, Thorbjørn Ravn Ander |
Re: xsl:key, Jeni Tennison | Date | XSLT Documentation (Was: RE: How is, Jeni Tennison |
Month |