Re: XSL/T Engine Comparisons

[Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@xxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Sebastian Rahtz 

> Paul Tchistopolskii writes:
>  > When I was experimenting with different XSLT engines, 
>  > I found that only XT survived processing of  large documents, 
>  > all other engines fail to scale  - the result usually was the 
>  > "blow up" described above.
> 
> I would have agreed, until the 5.3 generation of Saxon. Have you been
> able to push that over yet? I have not.

No I have not. I'm almost sure that SAXON 5.3 scales better than the 
version of SAXON which I was testing long time ago ( because 
SAXON 5.3 was a major rewrite ). 

Those who want to test it in the way I did, it appears that 
egroups still  contains some variant of benchmark I have been 
using.

http://www.egroups.com/message/xml-server/203?&start=200

Rgds.Paul.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list