Subject: Re: XSL in IE5 From: Lee Goddard <lee.goddard@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 18:34:32 +0100 |
David Carlisle wrote: > > > Be fair, David: it is a pre-release. > > Wasn't it fair? > > People have been asking Microsoft to put clearer notices on their XSL > web pages pointing out that the XSL recommendation came out after IE5 > shipped and ended up being different to the XSL in IE5 since before > MSXML3 was even announced. > > They could now additionally point to the pre-release but that is a > separate issue, the main issue is to avoid user confusion over the > default IE5 installation. It is not Microsofts fault that the > specification changed, and its not really their fault that they have > distributed a few orders of magnitude more copies of their xsl system > than anyone else. But it is their fault that they haven't highlighted > the differences on their standard pages. The webrelease pages are > clear. But if you know enough to look there, you are not confused. David, I never used XML, let alone XSL or XPath, before last month. I'd no idea where to look for specs or code, other than w3c, but a basic web search turned up MSXML, and as they're members of the w3c I figured they'll eventually be kosha on this (don't mention J++). Anyway, the print can't have been that small: I've got 17% vision ;) Enough of this silliness from me, I'll butt out now. Cheers, lee -- Lee Goddard <l.goddard@sussex> Research Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Sussex, Brighton UK XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL in IE5, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: XSL in IE5, Paulo Gaspar |
[no subject], Tim Mogler | Date | RE: Having trouble getting SAXON wo, Buss, Jason A |
Month |