RE: arbitrary sorting (part II)

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: arbitrary sorting (part II)

Subject: RE: arbitrary sorting (part II)
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 21:30:53 +0100

> But, the question remains whether you can sort on a non-enumerable
> function
> that must be computed. Is it possible?
> 
[MHK>]  Yes, if the function can be composed using the standard operators
and functions of XPath. Otherwise no, without resorting to extension
functions.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
arbitrary sorting (part II) Oliver Becker - Wed, 12 Jul 2000 19:32:07 +0200 (MET DST) SoftLiban DACCACHE Walid - Thu, 13 Jul 2000 08:34:29 +0300 Richard Light - Thu, 13 Jul 2000 08:01:51 +0100 <Possible follow-ups> Anjul Srivastava - Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:44:45 -0400 Kay Michael - Wed, 12 Jul 2000 21:30:53 +0100 <= Kay Michael - Wed, 12 Jul 2000 21:32:15 +0100

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: arbitrary sorting (part II), Anjul Srivastava	Thread	RE: arbitrary sorting (part II), Kay Michael
RE: building a link..., sixty nine	Date	RE: arbitrary sorting (part II), Kay Michael
	Month