Subject: Re: arbitrary sorting (part II) From: Richard Light <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 08:01:51 +0100 |
In message <396D54E5.4F6F5DF1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, SoftLiban DACCACHE Walid <Walid.Daccache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes >Hey Oliver, > > It is a good Idea. I was just wondering if you can sort ascending and >descending or just one way. Check the spec. xsl:sort has an 'order' attribute, with possible values 'ascending' (the default) or 'descending'. Richard Light SGML/XML and Museum Information Consultancy richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: arbitrary sorting (part II), SoftLiban DACCACHE W | Thread | RE: arbitrary sorting (part II), Anjul Srivastava |
"Simple" matrix transformation, Eric E. Cohen | Date | Re: Combining XML data, T_MULLEN 58211 6th S |
Month |