Subject: RE: arbitrary sorting (Part IV) From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 16:21:56 +0100 |
> but you could presumably use count(preceding-sibling::*)+1 Of course. Silly me. Mike K XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: arbitrary sorting (Part IV), David Carlisle | Thread | Re: arbitrary sorting (Part IV), Oliver Becker |
sequentially counting in XSL, Hugo de Groot | Date | RE: [newbie] output , Sean Johnson |
Month |