Subject: XSLT engine performance From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 16:16:12 +0100 (BST) |
What is it with me and Oracle? I just ran a test to see how different XSLT processors coped with reading a 3mbyte XML file and going over the tree twice: real user sys XT: 0m23.131s 0m19.030s 0m0.510s Saxon: 0m35.125s 0m28.900s 0m0.730s Sablotron: 0m47.187s 0m39.320s 0m1.300s Xalan: 0m55.277s 0m50.540s 0m1.280s Oracle: 6m56.811s 1m15.790s 0m10.920s the interesting results here are - Oracle has some real problem in working well for me :-} - Sablotron is slower than Saxon, despite being compiled C++ bizarrely, Xalan produced the results even though it (rightly) said my XML file was not valid against the DTD. Is this to be expected? does anyone have reason to doubt the above ranking, apart from the odd Oracle result? Sebastian Rahtz XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
?XSL & XML inside one file, Serg Stone | Thread | Re: XSLT engine performance, Matt Sergeant |
Html Link to Open xsl, Rooji Sugathan | Date | MSXML3: Numerical sort needed..., Gene Lake |
Month |