Subject: RE: XSLT engine performance From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:53:42 +0100 (BST) |
Dylan Walsh writes: > It would be interesting to see Suns XSLT compiler (a.k.a "translets") > included. I have used it, and am impressed. It is easier to use and more > compliant than I had expected (it is still a "technology preview") and, > subjectively, seems very fast. if anyone wants to try my silly test, its at http://users.ox.ac.uk/~rahtz/xsltest2.zip (cem.xml and ex10.xsl). the style sheet is trivial - it does a for-each select='top level element' (about 2500 of them), and then an apply-templates which generates some simplistic styling. The only interest is that it gives a decent-sized tree for a processor to chew on, and run over. Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSLT engine performance, Dylan Walsh | Thread | RE: XSLT engine performance, Heather Lindsay |
RE: Html Link to Open xsl, Ben C. | Date | Michael Kay's Book, Charles Cantrell |
Month |