Subject: RE: portability. (Re: microsoft latest, bug with extension elemen ts )? From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 11:23:33 +0100 |
> I know what you mean, but do you see a lot of evidence that the > practice is so prevalent? Personally, I find it fairly easy to steer > clear of temptation. And lets be clear that Mike Kay does not > *promote* such a thing - so far as I can see, he simply finds it > interesting to investigate and implement possible extensions to XSLT, > and its a good service to the community to be able to play with them. A reasonable analysis. Where users identify a limitation in XSLT, I like to explore how that limitation might be lifted within the conformance rules, but I'm well aware that this gives users a new problem of deciding whether to exploit the extensions or stick within the standard. I like to think that the primary purpose of the extensions is to explore ideas which if they prove successful might make it into a future version of the standard, but users should certainly be aware that if better ideas come along, I will ditch them unceremoniously. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: a novice's question, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Nodeset displayed as <ul>-list, Conny Kreyßel |
RE: Sort supported processors ???, Kay Michael | Date | Nodeset displayed as <ul>-list, Conny Kreyßel |
Month |