Subject: RE: include vs. xsl:import From: Matthew Bentley <Matthew.bentley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:42:40 +1200 |
>From my recent experience, using xsl:include is useful for trouble-shooting (detecting) duplicate template matches/named templates (In those cases where duplicates should not exist). I see no other apparent reason for it being in the spec - Cheers, matt ****************************************************************** Warning: This email, including any attachments, is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. Republication and redissemination, including posting to news groups or web pages, is strictly prohibited without the express prior consent of Brooker's Limited. ****************************************************************** XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL to popolate Popup Navigator, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: include vs. xsl:import, Evan Lenz |
Re: Saxon VS XT, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: portability. (Re: microsoft lat, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |