Subject: RE: more on XSLT processor performance From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:45:29 +0100 (BST) |
Matthew Bentley writes: > >For my type of work, in my computer setup, Saxon wins pretty > >easily. Others will have different criteria to choose from what is > >really a very rich field of contenders. > > I agree. Saxon, at the current point in time, seems to be the winner. > However, I'd like to see more compiled XSLT processors than Java ones. > 5.5 hours to process a 69 MB file is not practical - what does that have to do with compiled? seriously. when the Java one gets into memory, do you really see a huge difference in the kind of work an XSLT processor does? ie string processing and walking tree structures in memory. sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: more on XSLT processor performa, Matthew Bentley | Thread | RE: more on XSLT processor performa, Matt Sergeant |
RE: FO, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | RE: FO, Christopher R. Maden |
Month |