Subject: RE: strict error handling (was include vs. xsl:import) From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:21:20 +0100 |
Kay Michael > I think Xalan's > approach of producing warnings is better in many cases. As I've said before, I'd like to see that approach in all the processors. Since its a screen warning, it can be ignored, its not fatal, but it does alert the author as to a potential source of problems. An excellent compromise IMHO. Regards DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: strict error handling (was inc, Kay Michael | Thread | Conditional inclusion, Brian Charlton |
Re: portability. (Re: microsoft lat, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | RE: more on XSLT processor performa, Thorbjørn Ravn Ander |
Month |