Subject: RE: Standard XPath expression for the intersection of two node sets (Was: RE: How can I test if an node included in a nodeset) From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 11:39:36 +0100 |
At 02:49 PM 8/2/00 +0100, Mike wrote: >> Therefore, there's no need for a >> node-set intersection extension function. > >I think that's a little like saying there's no need for an addition operator >because you can always write a - - b. So put addition on the wish list for 1.1, and use a - - b until we get it...? I certainly have no objection to having the extension function available; but personally I'm not so inclined to use it if a workable way is already provided for. (When it's not workable, say too slow, that's a different story.) Cheers, Wendell ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: element name="substring-before(, Heiner de Wendt | Thread | RE: Heeeeeeeeelp, Wendell Piez |
Re: portability. (Re: microsoft lat, Paul Tchistopolskii | Date | Re: Adding a childnode to a DataIsl, Sunny |
Month |