Subject: count() vs. xsl:number (was: Measuring performance) From: David_Marston@xxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:04:12 -0400 |
While writing about performance measurement, Joe Ortiz said: >Also, there are a few resources that indicate the efficiency >of using certain commands over others (ie using count instead >of xsl:number for certain applications). If you have a situation where either count() or xsl:number can do the job, I would certainly favor count!! I discourage the use of xsl:number for simple counting, because it's so big and featureful. It's purpose is to generate output numbering when you need to display all individual items in a set and number them. The count() function is simple and, depending on the argument, may be able to take advantage of prior counting activity that occurred. .................David Marston XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Code between comments does not pars, Paul_Dick | Thread | division one big XHTML page to seve, Zvi |
Code between comments does not pars, Paul_Dick | Date | division one big XHTML page to seve, Zvi |
Month |