Subject: RE: Requirements for XSLT 1.1 (rtf/node set to boolean coercion) From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 16:52:57 -0700 |
> >So, no hurdles in the way of just dropping the rtf concept, good! > >David > Yes! And now we can (almost) let "result tree fragment" escape from our vocabularies into oblivion. Evan Lenz elenz@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.xyzfind.com XYZFind Corp. "Building Better Search" XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Requirements for XSLT 1.1 (rtf/, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: New document: Requirements for , Chris Bayes |
Re: Requirements for XSLT 1.1 (rtf/, David Carlisle | Date | Re: running a for loop (eg.1 to 10), Mike Brown |
Month |