Subject: RE: ANN: XSLBench - XSLT Processor Benchmark From: Lee Goddard <LGoddard@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:21:10 +0100 |
Andy - The C++ code you mentioned sounds interesting to me: would you mind forwarding, maybe to the list if not too bulky? Thanks, lee -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Kimball [mailto:akimball@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 4:24 PM To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: ANN: XSLBench - XSLT Processor Benchmark Kevin, Looking at your MSXSL driver code, I notice that you are not using compiled stylesheets. Are you using compiled stylesheets with the other processors (well, except for Sablotron, which you say doesn't support them)? If so, I would be happy to send you some C++ code that shows how to use compiled stylesheets with MSXSL. ~Andy Kimball MSXSL Dev -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Jones [mailto:kjouk@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 2:52 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: ANN: XSLBench - XSLT Processor Benchmark I just used the IBM JDK 1.1.8 without any memory arguments. From my work in Java this has always proved to be the quickest and most reliable VM I have found. I will try playing with the memory settings to see how that effects the results. The Sablotron processor is indeed a very good performer on the these tests but I must say the surprise for me was MSXML. Despite their early poor conformance record the results are good. It is puzzling to me that Sablotron does not appear to support any form of compiled style sheets. It's such an obvious way of speeding up the transform that I can't believe they have not thought about this? Regards, Kev. -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz Sent: 03 October 2000 19:11 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: ANN: XSLBench - XSLT Processor Benchmark Kevin Jones writes: > > To answer questions I was having over XSLT processor performance I have > built a small benchmark of some of the main XSLT processors. You can find > the results at, > > http://www.tfi-technology.com/xml/xslbench.html Thats quite interesting. I found when testing processors that the Java-based ones vary *widely* depending on the Java setup used, the memory allocated, etc. So I would take your results with a pinch of salt at present. The consistent feature to my eye of this test, the Perl-based reported yesterday, and my own is the excellent performance of Sablotron. I just hope they can keep up the work as they add the remaining missing features. Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: ANN: XSLBench - XSLT Processor , Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | RE: ANN: XSLBench - XSLT Processor , Thorbjørn Ravn Ander |
Re: Formatting elements, Paul Tchistopolskii | Date | RE: ANN: XSLBench - XSLT Processor , Thorbjørn Ravn Ander |
Month |