Subject: Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL) From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 11:07:31 -0600 (MDT) |
Paul Tchistopolskii wrote: > > Better yet, how do you define 'portable'? > > Mike, I already confessed that I give up. > [snip] > ( and I see that you really understand this magic, when I don't ). > [snip] > Again - I think you do understand situation really much better than I > do. Because, for example, I'll never push myself learning all the > "portability" magic you have learned. Your sarcasm is misdirected. This is a good discussion raising issues for the benefit of all -- especially the XSL WG -- to understand that, as you've been saying, the meaning and implications of version="foo" in the stylesheet are far from clear, given the behavioural differences between processors, in practice. > I say ( to myself ) : "this is a hell of #ifdefs I agree. - Mike ____________________________________________________________________ Mike J. Brown, software engineer at My XML/XSL resources: webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA http://www.skew.org/xml/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript a, Paul Tchistopolskii | Thread | Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript a, Paul Tchistopolskii |
re: sorting shares, Kevin 'esq' Byrne | Date | A very simple question, Adenilson Roberto Ca |
Month |