Subject: Re: .. and parent::node() From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 09:48:23 +0100 |
Alex, >This is a situation where SAXON (version 5.4) handles '..' and >'parent::node()' in different ways. 'parent::node()' returns an empty >node-set when applied to the document element, while '..' doesn't. XT >behaves the same. Looks as though this was a bug that has been fixed in more recent releases of Saxon. Saxon 5.5.1 gives the same, correct, result, whether parent::node() or .. is used. Cheers, Jeni Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: .. and parent::node(), Alex Albu | Thread | RE: .. and parent::node(), Kay Michael |
Re: Understanding difficulties with, Jeni Tennison | Date | RE: How to &&, Kay Michael |
Month |