RE: Testing position of parent

Subject: RE: Testing position of parent
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 19:04:05 +0100
> You said:      test="parent::lg[not(preceding-sibling::*)]"
> David C. said: test="not(parent::lg[preceding-sibling::*])"
> 
> Will there be any performance or other tradeoffs to these two
> expressions?  Are there any general guidelines for understanding the
> performance differences between two expressions like these?

The only way to find out is to try it. It's likely to depend on which
processor you're using (and which version). And it's not likely to make a
big difference.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread