Subject: RE: Thank you Tony (was: XSL-list doomed) From: Ben Robb <Ben@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:45:09 -0400 (EST) |
I agree with this: the XSL list is hosted very kindly by MulberryTech. I dread to think what that has done to their bandwidth, with 2000+ emails going out of their servers every day (and that, I think, is a conservative estimate). If we were hosted at e-groups, then each message would include at least 10 lines of adverts which we cannot control, simply adding to the size of the message. This list has about 60 messages a day; 18 months ago it was 15 or so a day. And yet the likes of Mike Kay, Andy Kimball et al still contribute on a regular basis. Would they still do this if they thought that the list was badly run? I think not. Ben XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL-list doomed., Mike Brown | Thread | RE: Thank you Tony (was: XSL-list d, XSL-List Owner |
RE: XSL-list doomed., DPawson | Date | Re: Rendering an HTML table twice, Lee Goddard |
Month |