Subject: RE: Call for Implementation: XSL 1.0 Becomes a W3C Candidate Reco mmendation From: sara.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:24:47 -0500 |
Well I got to it from the link? perhaps there's some other reason you can't get to it? because I'm certainly _not_ a member or an employee of a member... Sara > -----Original Message----- > From: Sebastian Rahtz > [mailto:sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 11:42 AM > To: fop-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Call for Implementation: XSL 1.0 Becomes a W3C Candidate > Recommendation > > > Max Froumentin writes: > > 2 Results of the Last Call > > > > The comment period for the Last Call Working Draft > produced a wide range > > of comments from the developer community and W3C working groups. > > > > Disposition of Comments > > http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/XSL1/comments.html > > > > wouldn't it be nice if we could read this page? why is the W3C so > obsessed with secrecy? > > sebastian > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Getting & to convert to %26 in , Chris McGrath | Thread | RE: Call for Implementation: XSL 1., Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: Changing a xsl:param value from, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: Getting & to convert to %26 in , Mike Brown |
Month |