Subject: Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re: Char node-type) From: uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 15:56:51 -0700 |
> > In my opinion there must be some requirements in the standard > > specifications about the minimum expected robustness and reliability of > > an XSLT processor. A good and necessary requirement of this type is > > that an XSLT processor should not crash in typical recursive > > processing. > > If I recall, scheme (and XSL's parent, DSSSL) mandate that > implementations perform tail recursion elimination. XSLT of course > hardly mandates anything about implementaions at all. > However it would be good to know if the common implementations > do do this, you said saxon does, what of the others? 4XSLT does. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, Dimitre Novatchev |
problems with contain function, vara prasad babu veg | Date | Re: Char node-type, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |