Subject: RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon From: "Nanto, Dan" <dnanto@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:22:07 -0700 |
We have been evaluating both Saxon and Xalan, and have not seen much of a performance difference. We are currently planning on using xalan. Did you see a large performance difference between the two? Were you using this at run time of from the command line? Any input would be greatly appreciated! -Dan -----Original Message----- From: Messineo, Chris [mailto:CMessineo@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:22 AM To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon I made the change from Xalan to Saxon, and did not have to change any of my xslt pages. -----Original Message----- From: Robert Herschke [mailto:robert@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 2:21 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: switching from xalan (J) to saxon Hello everybody, For performance reasons we will switch our renderer from xalan to saxon soon. Perhaps somebody has done this too. My questions: - are there some tables or lists of xsl-constructs that doesn't match in this two processors ? - are there known issues, like "Do not use this in saxon, as you do it in xalan"? - does anybody know something about conversions between XSL-files written for Xalan to XSL-Files converted for Saxon? --- or are there 100% compatibility between the constructs in XSL-files? Thanks for your help in advance! Robert XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: switching from xalan (J) to sax, Messineo, Chris | Thread | RE: switching from xalan (J) to sax, Messineo, Chris |
RE: check if nodes match xpath expr, Mabry, F. DR | Date | CSS, YueMa |
Month |