Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:key and document() From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:50:08 GMT |
> storing the base doc tree in a variable seems a bit hack-y and > inefficient. why should it be inefficient? (You are not storing the whole tree in the variable, just the root node) Getting back to that root node is a rather different problem from the one that Jeni was refering to which is getting the URI of that node. XSLT specifies that every node has a URI (even if it is somewhat artificial for constructed documents) it just doesn't let you know what that URI is. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xsl:key and document(), Robert Goheen | Thread | [xsl] xsl:when - comparing paramete, RUSSO, EDITH |
[xsl] SAXON systemid() usage. PLEA, Peter McEvoy | Date | Re: [xsl] Finding the maximun numbe, Jeni Tennison |
Month |