Subject: Re: [xsl] Character encoding in MSXML 3.0 from VB From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:32:02 -0700 (MST) |
Christopher R. Maden wrote: > Not to attempt to defend Microsoft's standards record In this area MS just built on what IBM did. So did Apple. And those companies are guilty of moving characters around. Why not beat up on them, too? Oh, I forgot, it's cool to bash Microsoft every chance we get, because they are the only company that subverts open standards. Right. Also, to clarify, the ISO/IEC 8859-1 *standard* only defines characters for the (decimal, 8-bit based) code space 160-255. The IETF/IANA-approved "iso-8859-1" coded character set for the Internet defines characters for the entire 0-255 range. The (very recently) IETF-approved "windows-1252" coded character set isn't subverting any *standards* because the "iso-8859-1" coded character set is not a standard. It is just a character set that was named after one. If anything, we should blame whoever came up with iso-8859-1 because they subverted the ISO/IEC 8859-1 standard when they included ASCII characters in it :) - Mike ____________________________________________________________________ Mike J. Brown, software engineer at My XML/XSL resources: webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA http://skew.org/xml/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Character encoding in MSX, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Character encoding in MSX, Kay Michael |
[xsl] Locating arbitrary duplicate , Daniel Bowen | Date | Re: [xsl] multiple documents, names, Dan Vint |
Month |