Subject: Re: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with the attribute From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:16:37 GMT |
> Actually isn't it > > ancestor::*[@attr][1]/@attr yes, although usually people want to do this to get "inherited" values, in which case,it wants to be: ancestor-or-self::*[@attr][1]/@attr or (ancestor-or-self::*/@attr)[last()] which coincidentally is exactly the same length (for this attribute name). David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with, Jonathan Borden | Thread | RE: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with, DPawson |
Re: [xsl] xsl:script: functions wri, Thorbjoern Ravn Ande | Date | Re: [xsl] DOCTYPE, Edierley Messias |
Month |