Subject: Re: [xsl] Can sets have order? From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:20:48 -0500 |
I'd also agree with my original statement. Terminology isn't always consistently applied.
Agreed here, but I can't think of a respectable terminology that restricts sets to be unordered.
This is a rather significant point in his discussion. --
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible (IDG Books, 1999) | | http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/books/bible/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764532367/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Can sets have order?, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | Re: [xsl] Can sets have order?, Uche Ogbuji |
[xsl] Keep-together and FOP parser, James Piva | Date | Re: [xsl] Can sets have order?, David Carlisle |
Month |