RE: [xsl] Can sets have order?

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] Can sets have order?

Subject: RE: [xsl] Can sets have order?
From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:15:09 -0000

At http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/N2624.html#N18349


I've tried to collate the mails on this topic, though Davids note
<quote>
The XSL spec is always very careful to distinguish  between "node set"
and the "current node list" the latter, being a list and not a set,
has an order, and that's what position() refers to. </quote>
appears a worthy addition.

Regards DaveP

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Can sets have order? Oliver Becker - Thu, 25 Jan 2001 18:22:05 +0100 (MET) <Possible follow-ups> Steven . C . Kienle - Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:03:09 -0500 DPawson - Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:15:09 -0000 <= DPawson - Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:27:34 -0000 Jiri Jirat - Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:47:52 +0100 Sebastian Rahtz - Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:12:46 +0000 Uche Ogbuji - Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:01:52 -0700

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re[2]: [xsl] Can sets have order?, Steven . C . Kienle	Thread	RE: [xsl] Can sets have order?, DPawson
[xsl] RE: [xsl] Special character ", Karsten Senz	Date	RE: [xsl] Can sets have order?, DPawson
	Month