RE: [xsl] So THAT'S what CDATA is for...]

Subject: RE: [xsl] So THAT'S what CDATA is for...]
From: RSuiter@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:51:05 -0600
Unfair to COBOL programmers, but otherwise right as rain.

> The Real World, of course, in the shape of the average commercial
programmer
> who should have stuck to COBOL, happily ignores the risk that the data
might
> contain "]]>".

Rick Suiter



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread