Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (node equality) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:39:07 GMT |
[trying to alter the subject headings, to split the thread up a bit] > how about "==" for a "same-node" operator, > complete with usual node-set comparison sematics? scary! will lead to user errors re = v == confusion (people already get confused between "and" and "&&" even though the latter isn't mentioned in the spec, and would be illegal XML) Also this would require a change to XPath. (I suppose XPath will change one day but harder than changing XSLT as there is no equivalent of the version attribute to flag changes) a prefix form would be safer: same-node(a,b) although that's probably a bad name since a and b would be node sets, even if they were "." . David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Francis Norton | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (node e, Francis Norton |
RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, DPawson | Date | Re: [xsl] treeViewer, Mike Brown |
Month |