Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:13:50 -0000 |
> Can you be a bit more specific about which XSLT 2.0 style "type system > ramifications" a <saxon:function> feature would raise that aren't > already raised in <xsl:script>? The aspiration is that XSLT 2.0 should be schema-aware in some sense, though I don't think anyone knows exactly what this means. But one possible implication is that functions should be in some sense polymorphic: there are already core functions whose behavior depends on the data types of the arguments, and it is desirable that user-written functions should also have this property. This isn't the case for the current <saxon:function>. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Francis Norton | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Francis Norton |
[xsl] To pass parameters to functio, nmartella | Date | [xsl] CDATA back to its original sh, Ruben Inoto |
Month |