Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 01:19:51 -0500 (EST) |
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Uche Ogbuji wrote: > > I think it would be very nice if someone set up a namespace for experimental > > extension elements and functions with some simple rules: > > > > * Anyone can define a function and register it in this namespace provided > > that > > - the name is not already registered > > - they provide a clear specification of what the function does > > - the function is intrinsically portable (i.e. it is theoretically capable > > of being > > implemented on any processor or any platform) > > - the function is free of side-effects > > - there is a four-week period for comments and discussion before the spec > > is frozen > > - the person registering the function provides open source > > implementation(s) that work with at least one processor > > - there is an opportunity for other people to provide implementation(s) > > for other processors. > > Now you're talking. > > Is it not worth trying out this approach for a while before > diving in with the XSLT 1.1 stuff? Nice. Very Nice. ;) Clark XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Clark C. Evans | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Kaganovich, Yevgeniy |
Month |