Subject: [xsl] W3 XSLT 2.0 Requirements -- 2.6 (Was: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:34:57 -0800 (PST) |
From: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xslt20req-20010214 "2.6 Should Allow Authoring Extension Functions in XSLT As part of the XSLT 1.1 work done on extension functions, a proposal to author XSLT extension functions in XSLT itself was deferred for reconsideration in XSLT 2.0. This would allow the functions in an extension namespace to be implemented in "pure" XSLT, without resulting to external programming languages." Dimitre. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xsl:script and side-effec, DPawson | Thread | Re: [xsl] W3 XSLT 2.0 Requirements , Francis Norton |
RE: [xsl] FAQ at www.dpawson.co.uk, DPawson | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, DPawson |
Month |