Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template

Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template
From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:13:11 +0000
David Carlisle wrote:
> 
<snip good explanation>
> 
> There is no way for a named template to emulate copy-of which is one
> reeasons why viewing XSLT functions as syntaxtic sugar for named
> templates may not be quite the right thing and you need something like
> saxon:return.
> 
Thank you - I *was* being lazy!

Francis.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread