Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (portability) From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:13:11 +0000 |
David Carlisle writes: > order) I don't really know why i use xt out of preference except habit > and it takes less keystrokes, cp saxon xt > But for me, a portable stylesheet doesn't use keys doesn't use any fancy > java extensions (but can use some built in ones like multiple output its silly avoiding keys, just because of XT. they work fine in the complete implementations, of which we have a good selection. OK, maybe keys are immoral, cos the engine should do it behind the scenes, but I don't see anyone getting that far this year. sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (portab, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (portab, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Rescuing XSLT from Niche , David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 Grouping Use Cas, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |