Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 1.2 available From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:24:15 +0000 |
Michael Kay writes: > <some-outer-lre xsl:version="1.1"> > <xsl:document ...> > <xsl:fallback>...</xsl:fallback> > </xsl:document> > </some-outer-lre> ah, so *thats* the answer. gotcha. I'll try using it > But if there are problems with this it sounds as if there is a valid reason > for reintroducing saxon:output (or saxon:document) as a synonym, in the same > way as I did with xsl:script. I really think that would be a good idea, to stop the hordes of Saxon fans, like me, finding that their old stylesheets stop working overnight :-} yes of course I should have read the docs, but I have tended to just grab the currrent Saxon and have faith in it.. sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-proce, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] [XSLT] - Recognize an XML nod, Nicola Martella |
Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Re: Reliance on i, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] Rescuing XSLT from Niche , Jeni Tennison |
Month |