Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:49:10 GMT |
> I was just suggesting that there be a "xf" namespace > such that: Oh yes, so you were, sorry! David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, Clark C. Evans |
[xsl] problem with Xalan_J_2_0_0, Henri Delebecque | Date | Re: [xsl] news, David Carlisle |
Month |