Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)

Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)
From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:32:46 -0700
> > I think clearly separating the specification of the abilities:
> >
> >   -> to statically define and statically
> >      invoke functions in XSLT, and
> >
> >   -> to dynamically invoke functions
> >
> > would be useful. Some implementors may be interested in the former,
> > but not the latter, or vice versa.
> 
> I do seem to be having trouble with terminology on this topic. By
> dynamic invocation do you mean something like
> exsl:function()/exsl:call()?

Yes, pretty much, but I'll note that I don't agree with Steve that there's any 
need to separate them.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com 
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread