Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template) From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:32:46 -0700 |
> > I think clearly separating the specification of the abilities: > > > > -> to statically define and statically > > invoke functions in XSLT, and > > > > -> to dynamically invoke functions > > > > would be useful. Some implementors may be interested in the former, > > but not the latter, or vice versa. > > I do seem to be having trouble with terminology on this topic. By > dynamic invocation do you mean something like > exsl:function()/exsl:call()? Yes, pretty much, but I'll note that I don't agree with Steve that there's any need to separate them. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Jeni Tennison | Thread | [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT function, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Not So Newbie XPath Quest, David Carlisle | Date | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Uche Ogbuji |
Month |