Subject: RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template) From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 21:28:59 -0000 |
> I hope that I and my fellow implementors who are interested > in these ideas can > all agree on a single NSRef for this set of extensions. I have the > opentechnology.org domain available. If this is amenable, how about > > xmlns.opentechnology.org/common-xslt-extensions How about xmlns.opentechnology.org/xslt-extensions/common to allow other groups such as /sql, /grouping, etc? But the namespace isn't important, it's the process for deciding how things get into it. The process can be very lightweight, but it needs to exist. My preferred option would be to have the decision controlled by a vendor-neutral referee whom everyone trusts. Any volunteers, Jeni? Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, David . Rosenborg | Thread | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Jeni Tennison |
RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] RE; Re: RE: syntax sugar , Michael Kay |
Month |