[xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT functions

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

[xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT functions

Subject: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT functions
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:08:24 -0000

> > > I think clearly separating the specification of the abilities:
> > >
> > >   -> to statically define and statically
> > >      invoke functions in XSLT, and
> > >
> > >   -> to dynamically invoke functions

I don't see any need for special syntax to invoke functions whose name is
decided at run-time. That can easily be done using a general-purpose
evaluate() extension that constructs XPath expressions from strings.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
[xsl] Common Extension Process (was: Re: Designs for XSLT functions), (continued) Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:48:14 -0700 Steve Muench - Sun, 18 Feb 2001 23:07:01 -0800 Jeni Tennison - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:28:48 +0000 Uche Ogbuji - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:32:46 -0700 Michael Kay - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:08:24 -0000 <= Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:42:18 -0700 Steve Muench - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:26:27 -0800 Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:39:08 -0700 Francis Norton - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 18:53:24 +0000

Current Thread

[xsl] Common Extension Process (was: Re: Designs for XSLT functions), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Uche Ogbuji	Thread	Re: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, Uche Ogbuji
RE: [xsl] apply-imports, Michael Kay	Date	[xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT function, Michael Kay
	Month