Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)

Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)
From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:52:01 +0000
Mike Kay wrote:
> But the namespace isn't important, it's the process for deciding how
> things get into it. The process can be very lightweight, but it
> needs to exist. My preferred option would be to have the decision
> controlled by a vendor-neutral referee whom everyone trusts. Any
> volunteers, Jeni?

Well I'm doing my best... ;)

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread