Subject: RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template) From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:25:58 -0000 |
> I must admit to being completely confused by XQuery. It seems like > reinventing XSLT but without XML syntax for programming constructs > (admittedly a fair step to take). I thought that it might be that > XQueries are for building XML from things other than XML, but the > XPath-like syntax seems to imply that the source (e.g. database) is > accessed as a node tree anyway. I feel sure that I must be missing > something. I think XQuery and XSLT/XPath are on convergent paths: they are tackling the same problems, and if each follows its natural course they will end up with broadly equivalent functionality. But they are coming from different traditions, and as a result they currently have different strengths and weaknesses, as well as different syntactic appearance. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Jeni Tennison | Thread | [xsl] XQuery (was Designs for XSLT , Evan Lenz |
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Joe English | Date | RE: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, Michael Kay |
Month |