Re: [xsl] Defining XSLT functions in XSLT 1.0

[Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Uche,

>> At the bottom of this mail is a questionnaire so anyone can vote for
>> the different options that we've discussed even if they don't want to
>> voice their opinion on the list.
>
> I just sent my votes, but I wonder whether the voting isn't a bit
> premature. I like quick decision-making as well as anyone else, but
> it seems to me some of the issues have not yet been fully explored
> yet. For example, we should fully discuss the remifications of the
> interaction between control structures and exsl:result so thet
> everyone can make an informed choice rather than just vote based on
> the cases he or she has in mind.

That's partly why I gave a <retract /> as well - so that if you change
your mind you can change your vote.  Most of the questions cover
things that we've discussed already, and I wanted to get a feeling for
what the consensus on some of these (perhaps less involved) decisions
were.

I fully expect the specification process to involve a lot more
discussion on the details.

Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list