|
Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template) From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:21:56 -0700 |
> So it would be plausible for us to specify an exsl:if() function that > we want them implementers to implement and to write into that > specification that the second argument must only be evaluated if the > first argument is true, and the third argument must only be evaluated > if the first argument is false. The only thing to consider about this is that it introduces a side effect. C programmers know how much complexity the seemingly innocuous x = a ? b : x++; can introduce. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, David . Rosenborg |
| Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Uche Ogbuji | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Designs for XSLT , Clark C. Evans |
| Month |