Subject: [xsl] thanks, also thoughts on xsl:script and xsl:function From: "Dave Gomboc" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:16:12 -0700 |
Various bits of good advice from (in alphabetical order by last name ;-) David Carlisle, Peter Flynn, Mike Kay, and Jeni Tennison helped me to eventually identify the problem: <!DOCTYPE ROOT [ <!ENTITY % character_entities SYSTEM "character_entities.dtd"> %character_entities; <!ENTITY events SYSTEM "events.sgml"> > It's easy to miss that closing square bracket! **Argh!** Re: <xsl:script>, I've done some more thinking about this, and have come around to the view that having a common binding per language is better than not having one. I would prefer not to see other languages inlined within XSLT source -- I take it that there must be a substantial user base that needs to have everything packages in one file instead of (for example) one per language? Support for an <xsl:binding>, without inline scripting, is about as far as I have swung so far. Finally, wouldn't it be useful for <xsl:function> to return multiple items? (Though I guess it would have to be called <xsl:relation> instead! :-) Sure, it is possible to encapsulate multiple values into a single one to get around this, just as it is in many other languages, but why create the need to? Dave XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] best way to divide select, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] thanks, also thoughts on , Jeni Tennison |
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Clark C. Evans | Date | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, David . Rosenborg |
Month |