Subject: RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template) From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:34:41 -0000 |
> It's crucial that the conditional operator only evaluates one > of it's clauses. > Otherwise you could not use it for recursive functions. Also you would > need that behaviour particulary when one of the claues had a > side effect > (using the more common definition :-). It's also important where one branch will cause an error. This is why XPath defines order of execution for "and" and "or". It means one can safely write if (function-available('exsl:eval'), xsl:eval('magic'), '****') Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, David . Rosenborg | Thread | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, David . Rosenborg |
RE: [xsl] Bug MSXML3 - xsl:number f, Andrew Kimball | Date | RE: [xsl] tutorial xml to xml using, Evan Lenz |
Month |